UFOUAPDISCLOSURE.COMIndependent evidence hubFacebook community ↗
RESEARCH HUB

Two tracks. One clear boundary.

Explore Paul Marziali's Quantum Fluid Multiverse Theory and the project's UAP research programme. Theory generates questions; evidence decides what survives.

A technical laboratory comparing optical, infrared, radar and waveform displays
REPRODUCIBLE INQUIRY

One event. Multiple independent constraints.

A serious reconstruction compares sensor geometry, environmental context, human observation and competing explanations. A proposed theory only enters after the underlying event has been constrained.

Original editorial illustration · Not case evidence
01

Evidence first

Observation, metadata and reproducible analysis come before theory selection.

02

Predictions required

A useful hypothesis must specify what could be observed and what result would count against it.

03

Status always visible

Hypothesis, model, simulation, preprint and peer-reviewed result must never share one label.

PEOPLE & ORGANISATIONS

Go directly to the researchers.

Find George Knapp and leading journalists, scientists, pilots, archivists, critical analysts and research organisations—with clear role labels and direct source links.

Open researcher directory →
THE BOUNDARY

QFMT does not prove that a UAP is extraordinary, and a UAP report does not validate QFMT. Any connection must be earned through pre-defined measurements, reproducible analysis and independent testing.

DATA

Sensor fusion

How radar, optical, infrared, acoustic and environmental data can constrain one event.

PHYSICS

Performance reconstruction

Separating real acceleration from parallax, range uncertainty, camera motion and processing artefacts.

HUMAN FACTORS

Perception and reporting

Understanding observation conditions without dismissing the witness or over-reading memory.