UAP reports are a documented reality.
Military personnel, civilian pilots and sensors submit observations that cannot always be identified at first review. Governments now publish reports, imagery and resolution methods.
Report a sighting The documented record is real. The extraordinary conclusion is not yet proven. Follow the documents, separate testimony from data, and keep the unanswered questions open.
AARO-published figures
Government-published; not independently verified · cut-off 30 May 2025Military personnel, civilian pilots and sensors submit observations that cannot always be identified at first review. Governments now publish reports, imagery and resolution methods.
An unresolved case may be genuinely anomalous—or simply lack the sensor detail, metadata or corroboration needed to identify an ordinary cause.
Publicly inspectable evidence has not established extraterrestrial origin, recovered non-human craft or a successful reverse-engineering programme.
AARO states that all 370 cases it resolved during the period were attributed to prosaic objects or phenomena and that nine incoming reports merited further analysis. This site has not independently verified those figures or conclusions.
Read the reportDisclosure becomes meaningful when documents, testimony, sensor data and conclusions are not treated as interchangeable.
The United States has a statutory office, reporting routes, annual reports and a public case archive. The UK recorded and investigated reports until 2009 and transferred its files to The National Archives.
A case can remain open because the object is unusual, because the data are incomplete, or both. “Unresolved” describes an analytic status—not an origin.
Published resolutions commonly identify balloons, birds, aircraft, satellites, satellite flares, drones, sensor effects and other familiar sources. Each conclusion still depends on the disclosed data and method.
Public hearings and interviews contain claims about retrieval and reverse-engineering programmes. Testimony matters, but it is not the same as independently inspectable physical evidence.
No publicly available evidence has yet met the standard needed to establish possession of a craft or material made by a non-human intelligence.
NASA states that it has found no credible evidence that UAP are extraterrestrial. That does not close inquiry; it defines the current public evidence threshold.
A concise timeline of the modern disclosure record—not a history of every sighting.
The UK Ministry of Defence ceased investigating UFO/UAP reports and later transferred its files to The National Archives.
The US Department of Defense formally released three Navy videos, making authenticated military material part of the public record.
A public intelligence assessment examined 144 reports and helped move the subject into a structured national-security and data-quality framework.
The US Department of Defense created the All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office to investigate anomalous detections across air, sea, space and transmedium domains.
NASA published its independent study roadmap. A US House hearing placed first-hand observations and programme allegations on the public record.
The US National Archives established a dedicated UAP records collection. AARO published its historical report and briefed the Senate in open session.
AARO published its latest consolidated annual report on 20 July and continued adding declassified case imagery and reporting trends.
The UK public record is mostly archival. In a parliamentary answer dated 16 December 2024, the MOD said it had stopped investigating UFO/UAP reports in 2009, had transferred its files to The National Archives and had no plans for a dedicated team.
Policy can change. This summary reflects the latest explicit public MOD position cited here; new official statements should supersede it.
A compelling story can start an investigation. It cannot replace the information needed to finish one.
Record date, precise time, location, viewing direction, duration and environmental conditions.
Preserve the unedited file, metadata and device details. Avoid crops and re-uploads as the only copy.
Collect accounts separately before witnesses compare impressions or see online explanations.
Check aircraft, satellites, astronomy, weather, balloons, drones and relevant sensor records.
Document who recorded, copied, edited, handled or analysed every important file or sample.
Test ordinary explanations first and state uncertainty instead of forcing a binary verdict.
For an immediate aviation or public-safety hazard, contact the relevant air-traffic or emergency authority. Never publish classified, export-controlled or personally sensitive material. AARO’s public submission route is currently limited to eligible current or former US government personnel with first-hand programme knowledge.
The permanent project now extends beyond the landing page into dedicated evidence, policy and community workspaces.
These links show what governments, archives and scientific institutions have published. Publication does not make a conclusion independently verified.